Vivat Academia. Revista de Comunicación (2024).

ISSN: 1575-2844  


Received: 12/12/2023                     Accepted: 03/18/2024                     Published: 29/04/2024

RESEARCH

 

AND NOW THAT THE GLOBAL HEALTH EMERGENCY ABOUT MPOX 2022-2023 IS OVER: HOW ARE THE HEALTH COMMUNICATIONAL MESSAGES ABOUT THIS DISEASE WITH MOST VIEWS ON YOUTUBE?

Y ahora que terminó la emergencia sanitaria mundial sobre MPOX 2022-2023: ¿cómo son los mensajes comunicacionales en salud sobre esta enfermedad con más visualizaciones en YouTube?

descarga Claudia Montero-Liberona[1]Pontifical Catholic University of Chile. Chile. clmonter@uc.cl

descarga Javier Abuín-Penas: University of Vigo. Spain. 

jabuin@uvigo.es

descarga Hugo Vilches-González: Pontifical Catholic University of Chile. Chile. hugo.vilches@uc.cl

 

How to cite this article: 

Montero-Liberona, Claudia; Abuín-Penas, Javier, & Vilches-González, Hugo (2024). And now that the global health emergency about MPOX 2022-2023 is over: How are the health communicational messages about this disease with most views on YouTube? [Y ahora que terminó la emergencia sanitaria mundial sobre MPOX 2022-2023: ¿cómo son los mensajes comunicacionales en salud sobre esta enfermedad con más visualizaciones en YouTube?]. Vivat Academia, 157, 1-20. http://doi.org/10.15178/va.2021.154.e1535 

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Following the end of the global outbreak of Monkeypox (known as “Monkeypox” or “Mpox”) in 2023, the importance of health communication messages cannot be ignored. With the aim of analyzing the information available about Mpox on YouTube, this study examined the main characteristics of the most viewed videos about Monkeypox, examining their reliability, usefulness, intentionality and impact. Methodology: For this analysis, YouTube videos about Monkeypox were selected based on the content that had received the greatest number of views. Results: Broadly speaking, of the 173 videos detected, among other results, it was found that the majority of the videos are published by content channels of various media outlets (43.93%) and by individuals (37.57%). Discussion: The main findings reaffirm previous trends, regarding the great success of YouTube as a health information consumption platform; although it was not possible to identify any specific influencer. Conclusions: Although this work is limited to a specific disease, future research is recommended that replicates this methodology in other types of diseases linked to health communication, to check if there are patterns of characteristics found in these videos that are replicated in other pathologies or cases. 

Keywords: YouTube, videos, Monkeypox, Mpox, health communication, public health.

 RESUMEN

Introducción: Tras el término del brote global de viruela del mono (conocida como “Monkeypox” o “Mpox”) en 2023, la importancia de los mensajes comunicacionales en salud no puede desconocerse. Con el objetivo de analizar la información disponible sobre Mpox en YouTube, este estudio examinó las características principales de los vídeos más vistos sobre la viruela símica, examinando su fiabilidad, utilidad, intencionalidad y repercusión. Metodología: Para este análisis se seleccionaron vídeos de YouTube sobre la viruela símica en base a los contenidos que habían recibido un mayor número de visualizaciones. Resultados: A grandes rasgos, de los 173 vídeos detectados, entre otros resultados, se obtuvo que la mayoría de los videos son publicados por canales de contenido de varios o medios de comunicación (43,93%) y por individuos (37,57%). Discusión: Los principales hallazgos encontrados reafirman las tendencias anteriores, respecto al gran uso de YouTube como plataforma de consumo de información en salud; aunque no fue posible identificar algún influencer específico. Conclusiones: Si bien este trabajo se limita a una enfermedad específica, se recomiendan futuras investigaciones que repliquen esta metodología en otro tipo de enfermedades vinculadas a la comunicación en salud, para comprobar si existen patrones de características encontrados en estos videos, que se repliquen en otras patologías o casos. 

Palabras clave: YouTube, vídeos, viruela símica, viruela del mono, comunicación en salud, salud pública.

 

1.      INTRODUCTION 

One of the most recent international health emergencies, declared by the World Health Organization (WHO) on July 23, 2022, was the epidemic of monkeypox (also known as simian smallpox, "Monkeypox" or "Mpox"). During its prevalence, this disease constituted such a worrying global threat that many international experts even feared a new and possible "epidemic", comparing it to COVID-19 (Mishra et al., 2023; Islam et al., 2022). The figures for this condition were distressing: 89.308 cases between January 1 and August 9, 2023, including 152 deaths in 113 countries (PAHO-WHO, n.d.). Since the last situation report, between July 14 to August 9, 2023, a total of 1.020 new cases were reported, an increase of 1.2% from the previous total, and three new cases in Trinidad and Tobago (Infobae, 2023). However, despite these figures, on May 10, 2023, WHO declared the end of this health emergency, based on the beginning of a significant decrease in international cases (PAHO-WHO, 2023a).

Considering the almost ten months that the world was under alert, Mpox constituted a disease that was disseminated both in traditional media and through social networks. In the case of the latter, specific studies on its presence were conducted on platforms such as Reddit (Hong, 2023), Google Trends (Shepherd et al., 2023), Facebook (Movahedi-Nia et al., 2023), among others. But, of all the digital platforms, communication and health experts agree that YouTube is one of the main ways to communicate topics of this type, being "a potentially effective medium for disseminating knowledge and supporting health-related activities and decision making by the public" (Haslam et al., 2019, p. 64). Researchers such as Jana et al. (2023), Yapici and Gülseren (2023), and Comeau et al. (2023) have conducted studies on Mpox content disseminated on YouTube, agreeing on the urgency of informing and educating citizens with useful and quality content. Today, almost seven months after the official end of this disease, its presence is still ongoing. Therefore, to dismiss possible future scenarios would still be a serious mistake; even more so, considering that it is the responsibility of all citizens of the world. 

Although the international emergency has come to an end, we still do not know whether new cases could continue to emerge. Therefore, and as a starting point, this exploratory study will describe and examine the type of information circulating about Mpox on YouTube, as well as the possible emergence of any influencers, based on those with the highest number of views. To meet these objectives, this article has been organized into the following key sections: (a) theoretical background and previous research on the subject; (b) methodology used; and, finally, (c) results and conclusions of the study conducted.

2.      Background on Mpox 

Mpox is a zoonotic disease that is transmitted mainly from animals to humans and has the potential to be transmitted from person to person through different routes, such as: direct contact with body fluids such as droplets from the respiratory tract of people through the air; by sexual transmission, mainly sexual intercourse between men associated with anal and genital lesions, feces and saliva; or cases of vertical transmission, occurring through the placenta from mother to fetus, or by close contact during and after birth with infected persons (Amer et al., 2023). 

Among the most common symptoms and signs are skin rashes or mucosal lesions, accompanied by fever, headache, muscle aches, back pain, lack of energy and swollen lymph nodes (PAHO-WHO, 2023b). Other consequences include pneumonia; corneal infection with loss of vision; pain or difficulty swallowing, vomiting and diarrhea; sepsis; heart (myocarditis), rectum (proctitis), genital organs (balanitis) or urinary tract (urethritis); and death (PAHO-WHO, 2023b). People at higher risk of severity and death are immunocompromised patients, people with HIV who are not well controlled or treated, among other cases.

2.1.            The importance of YouTube for communicating about Mpox

In health communication, Mpox is a disease that should not be neglected. Although the WHO called to consider clinical, epidemiological, diagnostic and treatment aspects worldwide, communication efforts to warn, inform and educate citizens about this disease cannot be forgotten. International research confirms the importance of social networks in communicating health content (Smailhodzic et al., 2016; Schillinger et al., 2020). 

Among the main social networking platforms, YouTube has been highlighted for its high role and social value in communicating about health (Briones et al., 2012; Madathil et al., 2015; Tong et al., 2022). Ten years after its creation, in 2015, YouTube was a recognized platform for the dissemination of health information; although, in parallel, it warned of content that contradicted "reference standards" and projected the possibility that "a non-specialized user [could] find such content" was "relatively high" (Madathil et al., 2015, p. 173). Although at the time it was the most widely used platform in the field of health communication, social organizations already had the ability to deliver messages that contributed to "changing patients' beliefs about controversial topics such as vaccines" (Madathil et al., 2015, p. 173). This was especially important, at the time, this platform was available to meet the need to "design interventions to enable consumers to critically assimilate published information" (Madathil et al., 2015, p. 173). Undoubtedly, one of the main features that stood out the most about this platform was that it allowed both "sharing and disseminating health information in a timely manner; fulfilling a function both as a video repository and as a social networking interface, where users could interact and socialize" (Madathil et al., 2015, p. 174). 

During the following years, YouTube continued to lead the international rankings as one of the most popular social networks for the consumption of health information. Specifically, during the COVID-19 pandemic, which started in 2020, YouTube video consumption spiked mostly in the four countries most affected by this disease during its first months: United States, United Kingdom, Spain, and Italy (Martinez et al., 2022). This upward trend continued to promote high viewing of health content on YouTube. Today, after reviewing the report Digital 2023: Global Overview Report (Kemp, 2023), You Tube is considered the second platform with the most monthly active users in the world, being only surpassed by Facebook. This result is consistent with YouTube's latest "official" statement, which indicates that they have "more than 2 billion monthly connected users" (Kem, 2023). 

In relation to monkeypox, YouTube is one of the platforms where this disease has been present since its international outbreak. According to Martins-Filho (2022), 

May 24 [in 2022] saw a sudden spike in searches for monkeypox on YouTube after World Health Organization (WHO) officials stated that the monkeypox outbreak is being spread primarily through sex. Since then, there has been a steady increase in online interest in STDs [for sexually transmitted diseases] on YouTube, with a peak on July 26, three days after WHO declared the current outbreak of monkeypox a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. Despite a decline in Internet searches for information on simian pox, possibly due to a 21% drop in the overall number of cases in epidemiologic week 33 (August 15-21), STI searches on YouTube remained high (p. 1).

Coincidentally, Tong et al. (2022) confirmed that, "YouTube has become increasingly relevant as a source of health information. It thus serves a dual function: as a repository of video content, and as a social networking platform where users acquire information through interactions with content and other users" (p. 3). 

Regarding the main studies on the 2023 monkeypox outbreak via YouTube, four papers stand out. First, Jana et al. (2023) examined the availability, characteristics, content, reliability, and quality of YouTube videos on the Mpox outbreak. After using only the word "Monkeypox," in May 2022, the researchers obtained 599 videos, in English language only, with "nearly half of the selected videos on recent simian pox outbreaks containing useful information" (Jana et al., 2023, p. 40). Reviewing only the useful videos, it was found that the contents addressed corresponded to the description of "epidemiological characteristics, transmission, signs and symptoms, and treatment of the disease; while diagnosis and prevention were less discussed. Only 8% of the useful videos focused on disease screening or testing (...); [whereas] delivering a discussion on prevention (...) is more than desirable" (Jana et al., 2023, p. 49). 

A second inquiry was conducted by Yapici and Gülseren (2023), who confirmed the importance of using YouTube by governments and specialized health organizations. From a total of one hundred videos inspected, between July 20 and 23, 2022, a sample of 44 videos was obtained. From their studies, the researchers concluded that, "the material uploaded by physicians and health institutions was statistically significantly higher than news agencies" (Yapici and Gülseren, 2023, p. 361); which confirmed the importance of publishing useful content by health professionals, contributing to decrease and ensure correct information regarding the spread of diseases such as Mpox. This last point should, therefore, be of significant relevance in the face of the emergence of epidemic outbreaks worldwide by health authorities. 

A third study in the year 2023 was conducted by Comeau et al., agreeing on the importance of cautioning the content on Mpox disseminated through YouTube. After studying a sample between May and July 2022, both on YouTube and TikTok, Comeau et al. (2023) corroborated the urgency of creating content by specialized physicians based on educational information on Mpox. Likewise, experts supported the urgency that "these platforms can be used as an educational tool and, at the same time, decrease the spread of infections and misinformation" (Comeau et al., 2023, p. 2). And, at the end of 2023, a fourth inquiry was conducted by Bayrak (2023), who assessed the quality of YouTube videos on Monkeypox after May 22, 2022. The results of this latest examination revealed that "the topics of the videos were mainly about symptoms (68.4%), transmission (48.5%), definitions (39.7%), and prevention (33.8%), and as for the sources of the video; news agencies/TV sources (106) uploaded the most videos" (p. 397). Additionally, Bayrak (2023) concluded that "quality video sources, such as doctors and scientific journals, should upload more videos to YouTube for users to access useful/quality information" (p. 397). 

In parallel to the studies conducted, last May 11, 2023, the WHO declared the end of the Mpox outbreak. On that occasion, the Director General of this organization warned that "this does not mean that it has ceased to be a public health challenge" (PAHO-WHO, 2023). Moreover, the International Committee of this body considered, at that time, that "these are long-term challenges that would be better addressed through sustained efforts in a transition to a strategy to manage the public health risks posed by monkeypox, rather than the emergency measures inherent in a public health emergency of international concern" (PAHO-WHO, 2023). This last aspect has, moreover, been recently confirmed by the work of León-Figueroa et al. (2024), who, after studying the most recent and reliable sources of information on Mpox in a total of 1.833 studies, confirmed, again, that "people access a variety of information sources to acquire knowledge about Mpox virus infection, with a strong emphasis on online sources such as social networks and the Internet." (p.1). However, these authors did not consider the different platforms or social networks separately, but rather, based on global information, corroborated the importance of social networks and their link to this disease. Specifically, it is now known that the prevalence of the Internet as a source of information on Mpox corresponds to 59% worldwide. 

2.2.            Influencers in the Mpox 

Influencers are commonly conceived as influential opinion leaders in various fields, including health. In that sense, as Pfender et al. (2023) conceptualized, "health influencers in social networks disseminate health information to the public, and at the same time, act as health educators" (p. 1). Moreover, they are recognized as "semi-professional micro-celebrities on social media platforms, such as YouTube, usually sponsored by brands to promote healthy living products to their followers" (Pfender et al., 2023, p. 1). Experts agree that, as opinion leaders, health influencers have the ability to influence and shape the opinions of their followers on products, services, and social and political issues (Bamakan et al., 2019). 

In the specific case of this research, the international literature has used the term "sexual health influencers" (Yang et al., 2021). The latter concept refers to "people whose knowledge and behaviors linked to sexual relationships influence, or are more likely to influence than be influenced by, their peers in their social network" (Wu et al., 2019). Therefore, influencers linked to Mpox are those people who stand out for delivering knowledge that influences other peers, in direct relation to this disease.

In summary, today, after the WHO declared the end of Mpox, and according to our knowledge, no study has investigated what has happened with this disease after its official end date on YouTube, as well as the possible existence of health influencers. Hence, and considering that the first half of 2023 to date has been one of the most key moments, this research proposes to investigate both aspects. 

3.      OBJECTIVES 

The main objective of this research is focused on knowing the main characteristics of the most watched videos on simian smallpox. The aim is to examine their reliability, usefulness, intentionality and impact. To this end, the following specific objectives are proposed:

O1. To know the people responsible for the creation of the most watched videos on smallpox.

O2. To identify the communicative formats used in the videos on smallpox.

O3. Analyze the type of content and what aspects of the disease these videos provide information about.

O4. To study the relationship between the previously analyzed characteristics and the impact obtained in terms of views, likes and comments.

4.      METHODOLOGY 

For the development of this study, a selection of YouTube videos on simian smallpox was carried out, with the aim of analyzing the contents that had received the highest number of views. Thus, the following search terms in English language were selected: Monkeypox or Mpox, as the most frequent general search terms when wanting to locate information on the disease globally. The terms monkeypox and monkeypox were also incorporated into the search, as the most frequently used search terms in Spanish-speaking countries.

YouTube was the analysis platform selected due to the rise of social networks as an information channel, for 39% of the Spanish population they are the main source of information (Amoedo-Casais et al., 2023). Specifically, 21% of Spaniards acknowledge using YouTube as a source of information. In addition, multiple studies point to the importance of video in information consumption. According to data from the report by Amoedo-Casais et al. (2023), Spain is the country in southern and western Europe with the highest consumption of news video (71% of those surveyed have watched a news video in the last week), with YouTube being the most popular platform for this purpose. It also highlights that it is an upward trend, as the frequency of daily use of YouTube in Spain in 2023 grew by 34% over the previous year, according to the Social Networking Study recently published by IAB Spain (2023). 

In September 2023, a search was carried out for each of these terms and the 50 videos that appear on the first page of YouTube results were selected, using the order offered by the platform that allows you to see the most popular content (by views), since they are the ones that have obtained a greater reach reaching the maximum number of users who perform a search on this topic. Of the resulting 200 videos in total, for the four search terms, duplicities were eliminated. 

After discarding the repeated videos, we worked with the database, eliminating from the sample those that were present more than once. Thus, the sample consisted of a total of 173 videos. An analysis template was applied to each video, which included, firstly, the general data on the broadcasting of each video (year of publication and duration in seconds) and its impact (number of views, likes and comments). This type of variable is used to evaluate the impact of the videos (O4).

The videos were also classified according to the type of transmitter or source (O1). To carry out this process, the classification references of Míguez-González et al. (2020), made from other previous classifications such as Basch et al. (2015) or Adhikari et al. (2016), were considered. Finally, a total of six variables were established for this category of analysis:

According to the format or type of publication (O2), we also considered the classification of Míguez-González et al. (2020), which was based on the previous work of Tuells et al. (2015) and incorporated the considerations set forth by Nichols (1997). Thus, a total of six variables were established: news, advertisements, documentaries or reports, interviews, conferences and exclusive material for YouTube.

For the predominant content type (O3), Míguez-González et al. (2020) performed an inductive coding analyzing in four variables: (a) informative content, when it is intended to inform about a phenomenon; (b) testimonial content, when the narration of one or several testimonies predominates; (c) advertising content, when persuasive content or content with a commercial purpose is in the majority; and (d) other, when content different from the previous one is found, such as could be, for example, musical content.

Finally, an attempt was made to identify the tone of the videos using the variables proposed by Míguez-González et al. (2020): neutral, emotional, humorous, warning or other. Although this category is not part of the proposed objectives, it can help to give more context to the type of videos published on monkeypox.

Table 1: Variables and categories of analysis. 

Category of analysis

Variable

Source

Broadcast and impact

Date of publication, duration in seconds, number of views, number of likes and number of comments.

Data from YouTube.

Broadcaster

Individuals, specialized medical sources, public institutions in the field of health, other specific health and/or wellness channels, various content channels or media, and others.

Míguez-González et al. (2020), based on previous classifications by Basch et al. (2015) and Adhikari et al. (2016).

Subjects covered

Description of the disease, questions and answers about the disease, reports about the disease (news), prevention of the disease, treatment of the disease, care about the disease, related to vaccine(s) about the disease, gender stigmatization linked to the disease, emergence of influencers about the disease or others.

Deductive methodology.

Type of content

Informative, testimonial, advertising or other.

Míguez-González et al. (2020)

Format

News, advertisements, documentaries or reports, interviews, conferences and exclusive material for YouTube.

Míguez-González et al. (2020), from previous classifications by Tuells et al. (2015) and Nichols (1997).

Tone

Neutral, emotional, humorous, warning or other.

Míguez-González et al. (2020).

Source: Elaborated by the authors.

5.      RESULTS 

The 173 videos analyzed about simian pox on YouTube have a median duration of just over 7 and a half minutes (470.08 seconds), obtaining averages of 764.023 views, 37.767 likes and 1.247 comments. In comparison, the median in duration is 3 and a half minutes (221 seconds), with medians in views, likes and comments of 169,907, 4.161 and 257, respectively. These differences between the means and medians are due to the fact that two of the videos uploaded by the account "Professor Of How" have 33.590.397 and 19.649.801 views, being the two analyzed contents with more views and also with more likes with 1.994.371 and 1.269.040. Meanwhile, the two videos with the most comments were posted by the "Dr. John Campbell" account, with 16.987 and 11.079 comments.

In contrast to those numbers, a total of 17 videos about simian pox have been identified without any comments, some of the accounts for having this option blocked. In addition, a total of 7 videos with no likes were also found. In this section, the account "Greater Than HIV" stands out, which, despite having up to 3 videos on smallpox with more than one hundred thousand views on average, has no likes or comments.

In addition, the YouTube channel "We Are Greater Than", which posted a total of 7 videos on monkey pox with an average 205.000 views, has the likes and comments disabled for its videos so they could not be counted in the analysis. 

It was also observed that most of the videos are published by various content channels or media (43.93%, n=76) and by individuals (37.57%, n=65). These are also the broadcasters with the most views, likes and comments, although in this sense the videos published by individuals obtain better results than those published by various content channels or media (Table 2).

Table 2: Analysis according to the broadcaster of the videos.

Broadcaster

Number of videos

Duration in seconds

Number of views

Number of likes

Number of comments

 

Total

%

Total

Average

Total

Average

Total

Average

Total

Average

Individuals

65

37.57%

37.088

570

59.277.764

911,965

3.605.377

55,467

108,315

1.692

Specialized medical sources

3

1.73%

5.166

1,722

648.274

216,091

9.244

3,081

404

134

Public institutions in the field of health.

20

11.56%

6.184

309

2.644.736

132,236

908

56

53

3

Other specific health and/or wellness channels

5

2.89%

1.607

321

1.669.417

333,883

101.976

20.395

5,103

1,020

Various content or media channels

76

43.93%

30.425

400

67.284.185

885,318

2.647.436

34.834

94.220

1,239

Other

4

2.31%

853

213

651.718

162,929

17.830

4,457

1.432

358

TOTAL

173

100 %

81.323

470

132.176.094

764,023

6.382.771

37,767

209.530

1,247

Source: Elaborated by the authors.

In terms of format, it has been observed that more than half of the videos are exclusive material for YouTube (59.54%, n=103). It is also the exclusive material that receives the highest average number of views and likes per video 1.061.082 and 60,902. This type of video has an average duration of 8 minutes (483.5 seconds), which is only similar to that of reports. In any case, in the number of comments generated per video, it is the report format that has obtained the best data with 1.930 comments per video (Table 3). This could be a clear indication that content generated specifically for a platform such as YouTube tends to obtain better results than adaptations of other formats. 

Table 3: Analysis according to the format of the videos. 

Format

Number of videos

Duration in seconds

Number of views

Number of likes

Number of comments

 

Total

%

Total

Average

Total

Average

Total

Average

Total

Average

News

28

16.18%

3.622

129

6.921.065

247.180

97.467

3.480

25.111

896

Advertisement

4

2.31%

68

17

1.028.834

257.208

 

 

 

 

Reports

10

5.78%

4.918

491

6.088.590

608.859

83.061

8.306

19.306

1.930

Interviews

19

10.98%

12.780

672

4.923.944

259.154

93.729

4.933

15.237

801

Conferences

9

5.20%

10.135

1.126

3.922.136

435.792

79.202

8.800

7.661

957

Exclusive material

103

59.54%

49.800

483

109.291.525

1.061.082

6.029.312

60.902

142.212

1.436

TOTAL

173

100 %

81.323

470

132.176.094

764.023

6.382.771

37.767

209.530

1.247

Source: Elaborated by the authors.

When analyzing the type of content, informative videos were the most abundant, representing 71.1% of the sample (n=123). Although in this section there are no clear differences between the average number of views, likes or comments when comparing the types of content, it should be noted that testimonial videos have the capacity to generate more comments per video than other ones (Table 4).

Table 4: Analysis according to the content of the videos. 

Content

Number of videos

Duration in seconds

Number of views

Number of likes

Number of comments

 

Total

%

Total

Average

Total

Average

Total

Average

Total

Average

Informative

123

71.10%

69.628

566

96.902.481

787.825

4.505.012

37.541

144.025

1.210

Testimonial

13

7.51%

1.901

146

7.845.334

603.487

353.419

27.186

22.140

1.703

Advertisement

5

2.89%

140

28

1.385.664

277.132

2

0.5

0

0.00

Other

32

18.50%

9.654

301

26.042.615

813.831

1.524.338

47.635

43.362

1.355

TOTAL

173

100 %

81.323

470

132.176.094

764.023

6.382.771

37.7678

209.530

1.247

Source: Elaborated by the authors.

The tone of the videos analyzed is mainly neutral (64,74%, n=112). However, it is the contents with warning and humorous tones that obtain the most views 993.073 and 899.930, respectively, and likes 55.051 and 51.272, respectively, on average. In the case of comments, there are few differences between the videos that use one type of tone or another (Table 5).

Table 5: Analysis according to the tone of the videos. 

Tone

Number of videos

Duration in seconds

Number of views

Number of likes

Number of comments

 

Total

%

Total

Average

Total

Average

Total

Average

Total

Average

Emotional

1

0.58%

15

15

140.586

140.586

0

0

0

0.00

Humorous

29

16.76%

6.011

207

26.097.992

899.930

148.6913

51.272

35.167

1.212

Warning

31

17.92%

17.956

579

30.785.274

993.073

170.6590

55.051

29.308

945

Neutral

112

64.74%

57.341

511

75.152.242

671.002

318.9268

29.530

145.052

1.355

TOTAL

173

100 %

81.323

470

132.176.094

764.023

6.382.771

37.767

209.530

1.247

Source: Elaborated by the authors.

When analyzing the topics covered by the videos on monkeypox posted on YouTube with the most views, it was observed that videos describing the disease (38,73%, n=67) and reports on the disease (21,97%, n=38) are the most discussed. In contrast, videos dealing with gender stigmatization linked to the disease and giving relevance to the sexual orientation of people suffering from monkeypox are the videos that receive the highest number of views (1.086,580), likes (81.472) and comments (2.870) on average, with quite a difference compared to the rest of the topics (Table 6).

Table 6: Analysis according to the topic of the videos. 

Topic

Number of videos

Duration in seconds

Number of views

Number of likes

Number of comments

 

Total

%

Total

Average

Total

Average

Total

Average

Total

Average

Disease description.

67

38.73%

22.034

328

45.608.173

680.719

2.204.895

34.451

58.843

934

Questions and answers about the disease

19

10.98%

21.503

1,131

15.046.119

791.901

261.056

13.739

36.406

1.916

Disease reports (news)

38

21.97%

22.379

588

11.863.436

312.195

317.366

8.351

48.483

1.275

Disease prevention.

6

3.47%

1.064

177

1.714.163

285.693

34.420

5.736

925

154

Disease treatment.

1

0.58%

464

464

105.955

105.955

6.166

6.166

244

244

Disease prevention and control

1

0.58%

360

360

81.034

81.034

5.403

5403

345

345

Related to disease vaccine(s)

6

3.47%

539

89

707.588

117.931

955

191

263

52

Gender stigmatization linked to the disease.

10

5.78%

5.109

510

10.865.806

1.086.580

814.725

81.472

28.705

2.870

Emergence of influencers on the disease

3

1.73%

590

196

53.616

17.872

6.336

2.112

315

105

Other

22

12.72%

7.281

330

46.130.204

2.096.827

2.731.449

124.156

34.998

1.590

TOTAL

173

100.00%

81.323

470

132.176.094

764.023

6.382.771

37.767

209.530

1.247

Source: Elaborated by the authors.

Finally, regarding the presence of an influencer in Mpox, the results did not yield any specific findings in this regard. In other words, none of the individuals that could be categorized in this specific area were found to be present. 

6.      DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

The main findings found in this research confirm, in general terms, the trends observed in previous studies regarding the use of YouTube as a platform for the consumption of information, also in the field of health. The amount of content analyzed on monkeypox, both in Spanish and English, as well as the reach that these videos have had in terms of views with an average of more than half a million views and a total of 17 videos exceeding one million views show that it is a source of information on health topics such as monkeypox.

In relation to the first objective (O1), it can be concluded that, although the user will find a significant diversity in terms of formats, broadcasters and types of content, the most relevant videos belong mainly to individuals or generic media. Specialized medical sources, public institutions in the field of health and other specific health and/or wellness channels barely account for 16.18% of the videos analyzed. In addition, they are the ones that receive the lowest reach in terms of views and the lowest interaction in terms of likes and comments, also far from the results obtained by individuals and generic media. These results are consistent with the conclusions obtained by Míguez-González et al. (2020), Adhikari et al. (2016) or Basch et al. (2017) in their analyses of content related to different types of cancer.

As expected, the most commonly used communicative format is YouTube-only material (O2). As expected, native content generated ad hoc for the platform is in the majority and also obtains better results in terms of impact at all levels: views, likes and comments. When crossing the data between the different variables, it has been found that specialized medical sources, public institutions in the field of health and other specific health and/or wellness channels are the broadcasters that generate the least exclusive material for YouTube, this being barely 19.23%. It would be highly recommended that these types of sources take into account exclusive content to try to reach a greater number of people.

The type of informative content with a neutral tone is the most present (O3). In any case, in none of the cases are the contents that meet these characteristics the ones that obtain the greatest repercussion or interaction. Warning and humorous contents are by far the most consumed videos on YouTube about monkeypox. This could be mainly due to the fact that social networks are primarily a space for entertainment.

While videos describing the disease or news about it were the most discussed, it has been found that gender stigmatization linked to the disease, especially affecting the LGTBIQ+ community, have been the videos with the greatest impact and interaction. In this sense, a series of well-defined variables have been identified that have obtained a higher impact than the rest in the videos on smallpox (O4). On the one hand, the topic of gender stigmatization linked to the disease is the topic that generates the greatest impact. Similarly, videos with a humorous and warning tone receive better averages of views, likes and comments, as well as material generated exclusively for the platform and content created by individuals or by the media. These types of variables have significantly influenced the videos on smallpox published on YouTube and should be taken into account when generating content related to public health issues.

On the other hand, it could be concluded that, while broadcasters specialized in health issues seem to make an effort to offer videos with a neutral tone and using an informative type of content, YouTube users prefer content with humorous or warning tones and generated by non-specialized sources.

This research is limited to the specific case of one disease, simian smallpox, thus future investigation is recommended to replicate this methodology in other types of diseases to see if the patterns of characteristics of the videos are repeated in a different context and if the conclusions obtained regarding the relationship between these characteristics and the impact of the videos are applicable in other types of public health situations. 

7.      REFERENCES

Adhikari, J., Sharma, P., Arjyal, L. y Uprety, D. (2016). YouTube as a source of information on cervical cancer. North American journal of medical sciences, 8(4), 183-186. https://doi.org/10.4103%2F1947-2714.179940 

Amer, F., Khalifa, H. E., Elahmady, M., ElBadawy, N. E., Zahran, W. A., Abdelnasser, M., ... Tash, R. M. E. (2023). Monkeypox: Risks and Approaches to Prevention. Journal of Infection and Public Health, 901-910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2023.04.001 

Amoedo-Casais, A., Moreno-Moreno, E., Negredo-Bruna, S., Kaufmann-Argueta, J. y Vara-Miguel, A. (2023). Digital News Report España 2023. El periodismo afronta el reto de la confianza ante los nuevos referentes. Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra. https://doi.org/10.15581/019.2023 

Bamakan, S. M. H., Nurgaliev, I. y Qu, Q. (2019). Opinion leader detection: A methodological review. Expert Systems with Applications, 115, 200-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.07.069 

Basch, C. H., Hillyer, G. C., MacDonald, Z. L., Reeves, R. y Basch, C. E. (2015). Characteristics of YouTube™ videos related to mammography. Journal of Cancer Education, 30(4), 699-703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-014-0769-9 

Bayrak, E. (2023). Global View on Monkeypox Epidemic: A Youtube Study. Çukurova Anestezi ve Cerrahi Bilimler Dergisi, 6(3), 397-401. 

Briones, R., Nan, X., Madden, K. y Waks, L. (2012). When vaccines go viral: an analysis of HPV vaccine coverage on YouTube. Health Communication, 27(5), 478-485. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.610258

Comeau, N., Abdelnour, A. y Ashack, K. (2023). Assessing Public Interest in Mpox via Google Trends, YouTube, and TikTok. JMIR dermatology, 6, e48827. https://doi.org/10.2196/48827

Kemp, S. (2323). Digital Global Overview Report. DataReportal. https://acortar.link/ISX9DY 

Infobae. (2023). La OMS confirmó más de 1.000 casos de viruela del mono y tres nuevas muertes en el último meshttps://acortar.link/rmhNcQ 

Haslam, K., Doucette, H., Hachey, S., MacCallum, T., Zwicker, D., Smith-Brilliant, M. y Gilbert, R. (2019). YouTube videos as health decision aids for the public: an integrative review. Canadian Journal of Dental Hygiene, 53(1), 53. 

Hong, C. (2023). Mpox on Reddit: a Thematic Analysis of Online Posts on Mpox on a Social Media Platform among Key Populations. Journal of Urban Health, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-023-00773-4

IAB Spain. (2023). Estudio de Redes Sociales 2023. https://acortar.link/k0kSrr 

Islam, M. A., Hemo, M. K., Chopra, H., Amin, M. R., Bhattacharya, P. y Dhama, K. (2022). Old Enemy with a New Face: Re-emerging Monkeypox Disease—An Update. Journal Pure and Applied Microbiology, 16, 2972-2988.

Jana, P. K., Patoda, S., Roy, P. K., Ghosh, B., Kar, S., Debnath, A., ... Dutta, S. (2023). Information on Recent Monkeypox Outbreak: Systematic Search and Content Analysis of YouTube Videos. Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Digital Health, 1(1), 40-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcpdig.2023.01.005

León-Figueroa, D. A., Barboza, J. J. y Valladares-Garrido, M. J. (2024). Sources of information on monkeypox virus infection. A systematic review with meta-analysis. BMC Public Health, 24(1), 276.

Madathil, K. C., Rivera-Rodríguez, A. J., Greenstein, J. S. y Gramopadhye, A. K. (2015). Healthcare information on YouTube: a systematic review. Health informatics Journal, 21(3), 173-194. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458213512220

Martínez, V. C., García, A. L. G. y Moraleda, I. J. M. (2022). 360 video trend on YouTube before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Creative Communications17(1), 22-34.

Martins-Filho, P. R. (2022). Increase in interest in sexually transmitted infections on YouTube during the monkeypox outbreak in 2022: A global infodemiology study. International Journal of Surgery (London, England), 107, 106970.

Míguez-González, M. I., García Crespo, O. y Ramahí-García, D. (2020). Análisis de vídeos sobre cáncer de mama en YouTube. Cuadernos.info, 44, 179-193. https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.44.1528 

Mishra, B., Rath, S., Mohanty, M. y Mohapatra, P. R. (2023). The Threat of Impending Pandemics: A Proactive Approach. Cureus, 15(3). https://do.org/10.7759/cureus.36723 

Movahedi-Nia, Z., Bragazzi, N., Asgary, A., Orbinski, J., Wu, J. y Kong, J. (2023). Mpox Panic, Infodemic, and Stigmatization of the Two-Spirit, Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer or Questioning, Intersex, Asexual Community: Geospatial Analysis, Topic Modeling, and Sentiment Analysis of a Large, Multilingual Social Media Database. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, e45108. https://doi.org/10.2196/45108 

Nichols, B. (1997). La representación de la realidad: cuestiones y conceptos sobre el documental. Paidós. 

Organización Panamericana de la Salud (OPS)-Organización Mundial de la Salud (s.f.). Mpox (Viruela Símica)https://www.paho.org/es/mpoxenfermedad 

Organización Panamericana de la Salud [OPS] - Organización Mundial de la Salud [OMS]. (s.f.). Brote por enfermedad de Mpox (Viruela Símica). https://www.paho.org/es/Mpox

Organización Panamericana de la Salud [OPS] - Organización Mundial de la Salud [OMS]. (2023a). La OMS declara el fin de la emergencia por viruela símica y pide esfuerzos sostenidos para el manejo a largo plazo de la enfermedadhttps://acortar.link/kb1vTS 

Organización Panamericana de la Salud [OPS] - Organización Mundial de la Salud [OMS]. (2023b). Mpox: Consejos y recursos para la población. https://www.paho.org/es/Mpox/Mpox-consejos-recursos-para-poblacion

Pfender, E. J., Wanzer, C. y Bleakley, A. (2023). A Content Analysis of Social Media influencers’“What I Eat in a day” Vlogs on YouTube. Health Communication, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2023.2260966

Smailhodzic, E., Hooijsma, W., Boonstra, A. y Langley, D. J. (2016). Social media use in healthcare: A systematic review of effects on patients and on their relationship with healthcare professionals. BMC Health Services Research, 16(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1691-0 

Schillinger, D., Chittamuru, D. y Ramírez, A. S. (2020). From “infodemics” to health promotion: a novel framework for the role of social media in public health. American Journal of Public Health, 110(9), 1393-1396. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.305746

Shepherd, T., Robinson, M. y Mallen, C. (2023). Online Health Information Seeking for Mpox in Endemic and Nonendemic Countries: Google Trends Study. JMIR Formative Research, 7, e42710. https://doi.org/10.2196/42710

Tuells, J., Martínez-Martínez, P. J., Duro-Torrijos, J. L., Caballero, P., Fraga-Freijeiro, P. y Navarro-López, V. (2015). Características de los vídeos en español publicados en YouTube sobre la vacuna contra el virus del papiloma humano. Revista española de salud pública, 89(1), 107-115. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/5614361.pdf 

Tong, C., Margolin, D., Chunara, R., Niederdeppe, J., Taylor, T., Dunbar, N. y King, A. J. (2022). Search Term Identification Methods for Computational Health Communication: Word Embedding and Network Approach for Health Content on YouTube. JMIR Medical Informatics, 10(8), e37862.  https://doi.org/10.2196/37862

Wu, D., Tang, W., Lu, H., Zhang, T. P., Cao, B., Ong, J. J., ... Tucker, J. D. (2019). Leading by example: web-based sexual health influencers among men who have sex with men have higher HIV and syphilis testing rates in China. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(1), e10171. https://doi.org/10.2196/10171

Yang, N., Wu, D., Zhou, Y., Huang, S., He, X., Tucker, J., ... Tang, W. (2021). Sexual health influencer distribution of HIV/syphilis self-tests among men who have sex with men in China: secondary analysis to inform community-based interventions. Journal of medical Internet research, 23(6), e24303.  https://doi.org/10.2196/24303

Yapici, O. y Gülseren, Y. D. (2023). Quality, reliability and content evaluation of YouTube videos associated Monkeypox. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, 6(2), 364-367. https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1229223 

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS, FUNDING AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualization: Montero-Liberona, Claudia and Abuín-Penas, Javier. Methodology: Montero-Liberona, Claudia and Abuín-Penas, Javier. Software: Abuín-Penas, Javier. Validation: Montero-Liberona, Claudia and Abuín-Penas, Javier. Formal analysis: Montero-Liberona, Claudia; Abuín-Penas, Javier and Vilches-González, Hugo. Data curation: Montero-Liberona, Claudia and Abuín-Penas, Javier. Drafting-Preparation of the original draft: Montero-Liberona, Claudia and Abuín-Penas, Javier. Drafting-Revision and Editing: Montero-Liberona, Claudia. Visualization: Abuín-Penas, Javier. Supervision: Montero-Liberona, Claudia and Abuín-Penas, Javier. Project management: Montero-Liberona, Claudia and Abuín-Penas, Javier. All authors have read and accepted the published version of the manuscript: Montero-Liberona, Claudia and Abuín-Penas, Javier.

Funding: This research received no external funding.

Conflict of interest: None

AUTHORS:

Claudia Montero-Liberona: PhD in Communication from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States (2012-2016), with a Master's degree in Social Communication from the Pontifical Catholic University of Chile, including a major in Communication and Education. Journalist graduated from the University of Santiago de Chile and graduated in University Teaching, Center for Teaching Development, Pontifical Catholic University of Chile (2018). Her main areas of research are organizational communication and health communication. Currently, she is a researcher at the Translational Center in Endocrinology (CETREN UC), and the Center for Cancer Prevention and Control (CECAN) in Chile.

clmonter@uc.cl 

Orcid ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6018-7490 

Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=sdfxDBwAAAAJ&hl=es&oi=ao 

ResearchGate: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Claudia-Montero-Liberona 

Scopus: https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=56470788900 

 

Javier Abuín-Penas: Graduated in Advertising and Public Relations (2014) and PhD in Creativity and Social and Sustainable Innovation from the University of Vigo (2020). He is currently Assistant Professor at the Department of Audiovisual Communication and Advertising in the School of Communication at the University of Vigo and coordinator of the Master's Degree in Communication in Social Media and Creation of Contidos Dixitais at UVigo. His main lines of research focus on digital communication and new media, especially in the field of sports.

Orcid ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7822-7526 

Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=bn4UxHIAAAAJyhl=es 

ResearchGate: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Javier-Abuin-Penas 

Scopus: https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=57226127424 

 

Hugo Vilches-González: Graduated in Social Sciences (2022) and he is currently an undergraduate student of Advertising at the Pontifical Catholic University of Chile. He works as a teaching assistant in the following subjects: Theory of Organizations and Communication; Social Marketing and Campaigns, at the Pontifical Catholic University of Chile. He has participated in advertising contests obtaining Grand Prix awards in COMUNICADV 2023 of the University of the Americas, Chile; and Bronze place in the International Festival La Pieza 2023.

Orcid ID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8438-9598

ResearchGate: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Hugo-Vilches-Gonzalez


Related articles:

Abuín-Penas, J., & Abuín-Penas, R. (2022). Redes sociales y el interés por la información oficial en tiempos de pandemia: análisis de la comunicación de los ministerios de salud europeos en Facebook durante la COVID-19. Revista de Comunicación y Salud, 12. https://doi.org/10.35669/rcys.2022.12.e303

Aguado-Guadalupe, G., & Bernaola-Serrano, I. (2020). Verificación en la infodemia de la COVID-19. El caso Newtral. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 78, 289-308. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2020-1478

Almeida, F. (2021). Social movements in a time of pandemic: The case of Tech4COVID19 in Portugal. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 6(2), 51-63. https://pub.sinnergiak.org/esir/article/view/151

Alonso González, M. (2021). Desinformación y coronavirus: el origen de las fake news en tiempos de pandemia. Revista de Ciencias de la Comunicación e Información, 26, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.35742/rcci.2021.26.e139

Castro-Martínez, A., Díaz-Morilla, P., & Torres-Martín, J. L. (2022). El papel de la comunicación interna en la gestión del teletrabajo durante la crisis de la COVID-19. Revista de Comunicación de la SEECI, 55, 29-51. https://doi.org/10.15198/seeci.2022.55.e768

 


1Claudia Montero-Liberona: PhD in Communication, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States, and member of the Communications Faculty, Pontifical Catholic University of Chile. Researcher Translational Center in Endocrinology (CETREN UC), and Center for the Prevention and Control of Cancer (CECAN) in Chile.