Analysis academic offering of the main MOOC platforms (massive open online course) and its importance in the 21st century
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study analyzes the academic offer of the so popular mass courses open online from the point of view of its contribution to the sciences and especially to the administrative sciences, starting with a look at the current situation of mass online courses at a global level And then analyzing their academic composition, considered as a reference of these courses for their importance, diversity, quality and content for all users who can access this medium for their educational process and personal development. The analysis is based on the holistic relevance of the relations of the educational institutions that are part of this portal and its factors of relationship and strengthening within the study network, which consolidates the network of themes that each institution offers. For the presentation of the results inductive and deductive methodology with quantitative approach through surveys to the students defined in the control group, achieving results that prove that this disruptive innovation of higher education contributes to the strengthening of students of careers related to The administrative sciences and they are willing to make this practice part of their curriculum.
Downloads
Article Details
The main author must deliver the letter of transfer of copyright, according to the model provided by Vivat Academia, Revista de comunicación, which declares the transfer of copyright to the journal and make explicit the rights of authors regarding the dissemination and use of the manuscript once published.
Creative Commons Attribution/Non Commercial 4.0 International
References
Bartolomé, A., & Steffens, K. (2015). ¿Son los MOOC una alternativa de aprendizaje? Comunicar, 91-99. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3916/C44-2015-10
Bernal, C. (2006). Metodología de la investigación: para administración, economía, humandades y ciencas sociales. Naucalpan, Edo. de México: Publicaciones Pearson Educación.
Chiape, A., Hine, N., & Martínez, J. (2015). Literatura y práctica: una revisión crítica acerca de los MOOC. Revista Comunicar, 9-18. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3916/C44-2015-01
EDX. (1 de Julio de 2017). Recuperado de EDX https://www.edx.org/schools-partners
Kizilcec, R. F., & Piech, C. S. (2013). Deconstructing Disengagement: Analyzing Learner Subpopulations in Massive Open Online Courses. Stanford University Paper Series., 10. Obtenido de Stanford University Paper Series.
Learning, A. (7 de Abril de 2017). American Learning & Media. Recuperado de http://www.americalearningmedia.com/component/content/article/539-entrevistas/7368-modelo-aprendizaje-moocs-promueve-competencias-transversales-esenciales-
Medina, R., & Aguaded, J. (2013). La ayuda pedagógica en los MOOC, un nuevo enfoque de acción tutorial. @TIC, 30-39.
MoocLab. (7 de Abril de 2017). Mooclab. Recuperado de https://www.mooclab.club/
Poy, R., & Gonzales, A. (2014). Factores de éxito de los MOOC: algunas consideraciones críticas. RISTI.
Prensky, M. (2010). Teaching Digital Natives. California: Corwin Press.
Shah, D. (18 de Enero de 2018). By The Numbers: MOOCS in 2017. Recuperado de https://www.class-central.com/report/mooc-stats-2017/
TEC. (2014). EDU TRENDS. Monterrey: Observatorio de Innovación. Recuperado de https://observatorio.itesm.mx/edutrendsmooc
Vásquez, E. (2013). El videoartículo: nuevo formato de divulgación en revistas científicas y su integración en MOOCs. Dossier, 83-91.