Communicative competence and new teaching formulas: the emergence of new models in classroom communication

Main Article Content

José Manuel Cardoso Belo

Abstract

In order to delineate a theoretical proposal, the paper presents a synthesis of research on teaching interaction organized according three perspectives: process-product, sociolinguistics and ethnography, and discourse analysis. If follows the concept of communicative competence. Finally, we propose two models: one on communicative competence and the other on didactics or classroom communicative competence.

In dealing with the dynamics of their interaction in relationships, our approach focuses on the relationship between individuals as well as individuals themselves. We assume, therefore, a pragmatic and interactive perspective. Our position is that competence is something that is created in the context of a relationship and, in this sense, communicative competence may be defined.

The relational model of didactics or classroom communicative competence presented is an integral model, based on the theoretical principles of the relationship, that seeks to integrate the key components of communication with a dynamic process. However, the fact that the model incorporates a large number of variables poses a challenge as for the means to measure the competence within the relationship.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Cardoso Belo, José Manuel. 2012. “Communicative Competence and New Teaching Formulas: The Emergence of New Models in Classroom Communication”. Vivat Academia. Journal of Communication, no. 117E (February):1291-1309. https://doi.org/10.15178/va.2011.117E.1291-1309.
Section
Research Articles
Author Biography

José Manuel Cardoso Belo, Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (Portugal)

Doctor en Filosofía y Ciencias de la Educación de la Universidad de Santiago de Compostela y Profesor Asociado con Agregación en el Departamento de Letras, Artes y Comunicación de la Escuela de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales (ECHS) de la Universidad de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (UTAD) en Portugal. 

Después de haber actuado como Director de Departamento y Director del 2º Ciclo de estudios (Master) de Ciencias de la Comunicación de la UTAD, es, actualmente, miembro del Consejo Científico de la ECHS y Director del Centro de Estudios en Letras (CEL) donde se desarrollan proyectos de investigación en las áreas de Lingüística, Comunicación, Cultura y Literatura patrocinados y financiados por la Fundación para la Ciencia y la Tecnología (FCT).

Ha participado en reuniones científicas en Portugal, Europa y Américas y ha publicado artículos y estudios en diversas revistas científicas nacionales y internacionales. Sus áreas de trabajo e investigación son las ciencias de la comunicación, en especial las teorías de la comunicación, la comunicación pública y didáctica. También ha publicado sobre la historia y desarrollo de la educación y está terminando un libro sobre la comunicación didáctica en una era de profundos cambios.

References

Au, K . & M a s o n , J. (1983). Cultural congruence in classroom participation structures: Achieving a balance of rights. Discourse Processes, 6.

Austin, J. (1971). How to Do Things With Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Baringer, D. & Mccroskey, J. (2000). Immediacy in the classroom: Student immediacy. Communication Education, 49.

Bernstein, B. (1971). Class, Codes and Control: Theoretical Studies Towards Sociology of Language. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Bryce-Heath, S. (1983). Ways with words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Canale, M. & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1.

Cazden, C., John, V. & Hymes, D. (1972). Functions of Language in the Classroom. New York: Teachers College.

Cherry-Wilkinson, L.(1982). Communicating in the Classroom. New York: Academic Press.

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Collier, M. (2000). Understanding cultural identities in intercultural communication: A ten-step inventory. En Intercultural communication: A Reader. Belmont: Wadsworth.

Crawford, T., Castanheira, M. Dixon, C. & Green, J. (2001). What counts as literacy:

An Interactional ethnographic perspective. En Literacy and the Curriculum: Success in

Senior Secondary Schooling. Australia: The Australian Council for Educational Research

Ltd..

Cole, P. & Morgan, J. (1975). Syntax and Semantics (vol. 3). New York: Academic Press.

Cochran-Smith, M. (1984). The making of a reader. Norwood: Ablex Publishing.

Craig, R. (1999). Communication Theory As a Field. Communication Theory, 2(9).

Cumming, J. & Wyatt-Smith, C. (2001). Literacy and the Curriculum: Success in Senior Secondary Schooling. Australia: The Australian Council for Educational Research Ltd.

Cupach, W.R. & Imahori, T.T. (1993). Identity management theory: Communication competence in intercultural episodes and relationships. En Intercultural communication

competence. Sage: Newbury Park.

Dance, F. E. X. & Larson, C. E. (1976). The Functions of Human Communication: A Theoretical Approach. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Delamont, S. & Hamilton, D. (1976). Classroom research: A critique and a new approach. En Explorations in classroom observation. London: John Wiley.

Dervin, B. (1989). Progress in communication sciences (vol. 10) Norwood: Ablex.

Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. New York: Methuen.

Emihovich, C. (1989). Locating learning: Ethnographic perspectives on classroom research. Norwood: Ablex Publishing.

Flanders, N.A. (1970). Analyzing Teaching Behaviour. Addison-Wesley: Reading.

Giles, H., Mulac, A, Bradac, J. & Johnson, P. (1987). Speech accommodation theory: the first decade and beyond. En Communication yearbook, 10. Sage: Newbury Park.

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. En Syntax and Semantics (vol. 3). New York: Academic Press.

Griffin, E. (1991). Communication Theory: A First Look. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Gumperz, J. & Cook-Gumperz, J. (1982). Communicative Competence. En Communicating in the Classroom. New York: Academic Press.

Gumperz, J. e Hymes, D. (1972) Directions in Sociolinguistics: Ethnography of Communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Gumperz, J. (1984). Communicative Competence Revisited. En Meaning, Form and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications. Washington: Georgetown University Press.

Gumperz, J. (1981). The Linguistic Bases of Communicative Competence. En Analyzing Discourse Text and Talk. Washington: Georgetown University Press.

Holliday, A. (1999). Small culture. Applied Linguistics, 20(2).

Hymes, D. (1972a). Models of the interaction of language and social life. En Directions in Sociolinguistics: Ethnography of Communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Hymes, D. (1972b). On communicative competence. En Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

Imahori, T. & Lanigan, M. (1989). Relational model of intercultural communication competence. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 13.

Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Littlejohn, S. (1996). Theories of Human Communication. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Co.

Mclaughlin, M. (1987). Communication yearbook, 10. Sage: Newbury Park.

Mehan, H. (1985). The structure of classroom discourse. En Handbook of Discourse Analysis. New York:Academic Press.

Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Nussbaum, J. F. (1992). Effective teacher behaviors. Communication Education, 41.

Pedro, E. (1982). O Discurso na Aula - Uma Análise Sociolinguística da Prática Escolar em Portugal. Lisboa: Edições Rolim.

Pride, J. & Holmes, J. (1972). Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

Samovar, L. & Porter, R. (2000). Intercultural communication: A Reader. Wadsworth. Belmont.

Savignon, S. (1983). Communicative competence: theory and classroom practice; texts and contexts in second language learning. Addison-Wesley: Reading.

Schiffrin, D. (1984). Meaning, Form and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications, G.U.R.T. (Georgetown University Round Table). Washington: Georgetown University Press.

Searle, J. (1970). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. London: Cambridge University Press.

Spitzberg, B. & Hecht, M. (1984). A component model of relational competence. Human Communication Research, 10.

Stubbs, M. & Delamont, S. (1976). Explorations in classroom observation. London: John Wiley.

Tanner, D. (1981). Analyzing Discourse Text and Talk. Washington: Georgetown University Press.

Van Dijk, T. (1985). Handbook of Discourse Analysis (Vol. 3). New York: Academic Press.

Van Ek, J. (1975). The threshold level. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

Waldeck, J., Kearney, P., & Plax, T. (2001). Instructional and developmental communication theory and research in the 1990s: Extending the agenda for the 21st century. Communication Yearbook, 24.

Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J. & Jackson, D. (2000). Pragmática da Comunicação Humana: um estudo dos padrões, patologias e paradoxos da interação (14ª ed.). São Paulo:

Editora Cultrix.

Wiemann, J. (1977). Explication and test of a model of communicative competence. Review of Educational Research, 50.

Wiemann, J. & Bradac, J. (1989). Metatheoretical issues in the study of communicative competence. En Progress in communication science. Norwood: Ablex.

Wiemann, J. & Kelly, C. (1981). Pragmatics of interpersonal competence. En Rigor and imagination: Essays from the legacy of Gregory Bateson. New York: Praeger.

Wilder-Mott, C. & Weakland, J. (1981). Rigor and imagination: Essays from the legacy of Gregory Bateson. New York: Praeger.

Wiseman, R. & Koester, J. (1993). Intercultural communication competence. Sage: Newbury Park.

Yamauchi, L., & Tharp, R. (1995). Culturally compatible conversations in Native American classrooms. Linguistics and Education, 7.