El andamiaje retórico de género: una deliberación sobre la cultura generizada de la Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez, México

Clara Eugenia Rojas Blanco

doi:10.15178/va.2015.132.125-161

PDF (Español (España)) PDF

Published: Sep 15, 2015

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15178/va.2015.132.125-161

Keywords:

Gender institutional culture - higher education - feminist critique - rhetorical criticism - gender ideology – Autonomous University of Ciudad Juarez

Clara Eugenia Rojas Blanco

Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez

Abstract

In this article, I present a succinct version of a comprehensive qualitative research project centered on the analysis of the gender symbolic structure in the Autonomous University of Ciudad Juarez, (UACJ), in Mexico. In this version, I offer a deliberation centered on the analysis of the persuasive / discursive formation, where I examined the relationship between rhetoric, power and gender from the approach of the feminist critique on discourse and contemporary rhetoric. In this case, the thesis that guides my discussion is that the gendered institutional culture does not allow the transversalization of the gender perspective, because the androcentric beliefs and practices within the university are not recognized, by the university agents (men and women), as sexist practices. In this text, I offer an analysis of a corpus of open-ended interviews, conducted with a group of full time professors from the UACJ where the normalization of the ideology of gender of the institution crystallizes. Based on my findings, I devised the “gender rhetorical scaffold” metaphor in order to explain the complex socio-historical process present in the re/production of gender within the UACJ.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Rojas Blanco, Clara Eugenia. 2015. “The Gendered Rhetorical Scaffold: A Deliberation about the Institutional Gender Culture at the Autonomous University of Ciudad Juarez, México”. Vivat Academia. Journal of Communication, no. 132 (September):125-61. https://doi.org/10.15178/va.2015.132.125-161.

Issue

Issue 132 - September 2015 - Year XVIII

Section

Research Articles

The main author must deliver the letter of transfer of copyright, according to the model provided by Vivat Academia, Revista de comunicación, which declares the transfer of copyright to the journal and make explicit the rights of authors regarding the dissemination and use of the manuscript once published.

Creative Commons Attribution/Non Commercial 4.0 International

Author Biography

Clara Eugenia Rojas Blanco, Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez

Profesora-investigadora del Departamento de Humanidades.

References

Acker, J. (2003). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations, In R. Ely, E. Foldy & M. Scully (Eds.), Reader in Gender, Work, and Organization, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Alcoff, L. (1992) The problem of speaking for others. Cultural Critique, 20 (4), 5-32.

Alcoff, L. and E. Potter (Eds.). (1993). Feminist epistemologies, New York: Routledge.

Austin, J.L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Biesecker, B. (1989). Rethinking the rhetorical situation from within the thematic of difference. In J. Lucaites, C. Condit & S. Caudill (Eds.). Contemporary rhetorical theory (pp. 232-246). New York: Guilford Press.

Blitzer, L. ( 1998). Political Rhetoric . In T. Farrell ( Ed.). Landmark essays in contemporary rhetoric (pp. 9-26). Hermagoras Press, New Jersey.

Butler, J. (1998). Actos performativos y constitución del género: un ensayo sobre fenomenología y teoría feminista. Debate Feminista, 9 (18) 296-314.

Butler, J. (1997) Excitable speech. Routledge: New York.

Buquet, A. et al. (2013). Intrusas en La Universidad. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Programa Universitario de Estudios de Género. Disponible en: http://www.academia.edu/8811934/Intrusas_en_la_universidad Consultado el 18/05/2013.

Campbell, K. (2001). The rhetoric of women's liberation: An oxymoron. In C. Morris III & Stephen Browne (Eds.). Readings on the Rhetoric of Social Protest (pp.198-211). Pennsylvania: Strata Publishing.

Cameron, D. (1998). The Feminist Critique of Language, London & New York, Routledge.

Code, L.(1995). Rhetorical spaces: essays on gendered locations. New York: Routledge.

Condit, C. (1997). In Praise of Eloquent Diversity: Gender and Rhetoric as Public Persuasion, Women's Studies in Communication, 20, 92-115.

Clair, R. (1998). Organizing silence. Albany: State University of New York Press.

De Vault, M.(1999). Liberating method: feminism and social change. Philadelphia: Temple UP.

Foss, S. (1996). Rhetorical criticism: exploration and practice. Prospect Hills: Waveland Press.

Foss, K. , S. Foss & C. Griffin (1999). Feminist rhetorical theories. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Glenn C. (1997). Rhetoric retold. Carbondale & Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.

Glenn, C. (2002). Silence: A rhetorical art for resisting discipline(s). JAC, 22 , 262- 289.

Gramsci, A. (1995). Selections from the Prison Notebooks. New York: International Publishers.

Haraway, D. (1988).Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, (14) 575-599.

Harding, S. (1993). Rethinking standpoint epistemology. ¿ What is strong objectivity? In L. Alcoff and E. Potter (Eds.) Feminist Epistemologies (pp. 10-35). New York: Routledge.

Hendricks, C. & K. Oliver (Eds.). (1999). Language and liberation: Feminism, philosophy and language. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Lazar, M. (Ed.). (2005). Feminist critical discourse analysis. Gender, power and ideology in discourse, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Lorber, Judith (2010) Gender inequality. Feminist theories and politics (4th Ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

Munévar D. & M. Villaseñor (2005). Transversalidad de género. Una estrategia para el uso político-educativo de sus saberes. En Revista de Estudios de Género La Ventana, (21), pp. 44-68.

Palomar C. (2005). La política de género en la educación superior, Revista de Estudios de Género. La Ventana, (21), pp. 7-43.

Palomar C. (2011). La Cultura Institucional de Género en la Universidad de Guadalajara, México D.F.: ANUIES. Disponible: http://biblioteca.universia.net/html_bura/ficha/params/title/cultura- institucional-genero-universidad-guadalajara-c-g-palomar-verea/id/54599660.html Consultado el 20 de septiembre 2013.

Rakow, L. & and L. Wackwitz (Eds.). (2004). Feminist communication theory: selections in contexts. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Sprague, J. (2005). Feminist methodologies for critical researchers. Bridging differences. The Gender Lens Series. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.

Scott, J. W. (2003). El género una categoría útil para el análisis histórico. En M. Lamas (Ed.). El género la construcción cultural de la diferencia sexual. México: PUEG/UNAM.

Wodak, R. (2008). Introduction: discourse, text, and context. In R. Wodak & M. Krzyzanowski (Eds.). Qualitative discourse analysis in the social sciences (pp. 1–29), Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Wodak, R. (Ed.). (1997). Gender and discourse (Sage Studies in Discourse), London: SAGE Publications.