Electoral political communication in the digital age. The 2015 electoral campaign in México City
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
With the arrival of the era of information society, there is an academic debate on the impact of ICTs in politics. This work explores a discussion of the conceptual and analytical framework for digital political communication in democracy, which is a starting point and then analyzes the use and presence of different political parties and coalitions on digital social networks during the campaign of 2015 in Mexico City and compares the electoral results of the main political groups, to reach conclusions on the results obtained in the framework of the theoretical discussion. Basic elements for the analysis of the digital context in election campaigns and the role of Information Technology and Communication, Internet, specifically digital media and online social networks are provided.
Downloads
Article Details
The main author must deliver the letter of transfer of copyright, according to the model provided by Vivat Academia, Revista de comunicación, which declares the transfer of copyright to the journal and make explicit the rights of authors regarding the dissemination and use of the manuscript once published.
Creative Commons Attribution/Non Commercial 4.0 International
References
Bimber, B. & Davis, R. (2003). Campaigning Online: The Internet in U.S. Elections. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
Brundidge, J. & Rice, R. (2009). Political engagement online. Do the information rich get richer and the like-minded more similar?, en A. Chadwick, & P. Howard, (Eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Internet Politics (pp. 144-156). Nueva York: Routledge.
Chadwick, A. (2006). Internet politics: States, citizens and new communication technologies. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
Davis, R.; Baumgartner, J.; Francia, P. & Morris, J. (2009). The Internet in U.S. election campaigns, en A. Chadwick & P. Howard, (Eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Internet Politics (pp. 13-24). Nueva York: Routledge.
Foot K. & Schneider, S. (2006). Web Campaigning. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Hardy, B.; Jamieson, K. & Winneg, K. (2009). Wired to fact: the role of the internet in identifying deception during the 2004 U.S. presidential campaign, en A. Chadwick & P. Howard, (Eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Internet Politics (pp. 131 143). Nueva York: Routledge.
Hindman, M. (2009). The myth of digital democracy. Nueva Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Howard, P. (2006). New Media Campaigns and the Managed Citizen. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
Karpf, D. (2012). The Moveon Effect. The Unexpected Transformation of American Political Advocacy. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
Lilleker, D. & Vedel, T. (2013). The Internet in Campaigns and Elections, en W. Dutton, (Ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McNair, B. (2009). The internet and the changing global media environment en A. Chadwick & P. Howard, (Eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Internet Politics (pp. 217-229). Nueva York: Routledge.
Norris, P. (2004a, enero). The Evolution of Election Campaigns: Eroding Political Engagment?. Ponencia para la conference on Political Communications in the 21st Century, Otago, Nueva Zelanda. Recuperado de http://www.hks.harvard.edu/fs/pnorrisAcrobat/Otago%20The%20Evolution%20of%20Election%20Campaigns.pdf.
Norris, P. (2004b). Political Communication. For the Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. Recuperado de http://www.hks.harvard.edu/fs/pnorris/Acrobat/Political%20Communications%20encyclopedia2.pdf.
Norris, P. (2000). A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Post- Industrial Societies. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
Oxford University Press. (2015). Oxford Dictionaries. Language matters. Recuperado de http://www.oxforddictionaries.com.
Panagopoulos, C. (2009). Technology and the modern political communication: the digital pulse of the 2008 campaigns, en C. Panagopoulos, (Ed.). Politicking Online:the transformation of election campaign Communications (pp. 1-17). Nueva Jersey: Rutgers.
Pew Research Center (2015). State of the News Media. Recuperado de http://www.journalism.org/2015/04/29/state-of-the-news-media-2015/.
Pew Research Center (2012). Low Marks for the 2012 Election. Recuperado de http://www.people-press.org/2012/11/15/low-marks-for-the-2012-election/.
Pont, C. & Berriò J. (2015). Comunicació i opinió pública. Política, periodisme i ciutadans. Barcelona: UOC.
Rubio, R. (2000). Internet en la participación política, Revista de Estudios Políticos (Nueva Época), n°. 109. Págs. 285-302.
Shapiro, A. (1999). The Control Revolution: How Internet is putting Individuals in Charge and Changing the World we Know. Nueva York: Public Affairs.
Smith, A. (2011). 22% of online Americans used social networking of Twitter for politics in 2010 campaing. Disponible en: http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/ 2011/Politics-and-social-media.aspx.
Trottier, D. & Fuchs, C. (2015). Theorising Social Media, Politics and the State, en D. Trottier, & C. Fuchs, (Eds.). Social Media, Politics and the State. Protest, Revolutions, Riots, Crime and Policing in the Age of Facebook, Twitter and YouTube (pp. 3-38). Nueva York: Routledge.
Wollan, R.; Smith, N. & Zhou, C. (2011). The Social Media Management Handbook: Everything You Need To Know To Get Social Media Working In Your Business. Nueva Jersey: Wiley.